PintoPay Card

Comparar Tarjetas de PintoPay

PintoPay CardActual

P

PintoPay Virtual Card

Recompensas

Reembolso

—

—

Cripto de Reembolso

—

USD

Recompensas de Staking

✗

✗

APR de Staking

—

—

Bono de Bienvenida

—

$10

Bono de Referido

$10

$10.5

Tarifas

Tarifa Mensual

Gratis

Gratis

Emisión de Tarjeta

$10

$35

Tarifa ATM

Gratis

Gratis

Tarifa FX

Gratis

1%

Tarifa de Recarga

2.5%

2.5%

Tarifa por Rechazo

Gratis

Gratis

Límites

Gasto Diario

$25,000

$1,500

Gasto Mensual

Sin límite

Sin límite

Retiro ATM

Sin límite

Sin límite

Info de Tarjeta

Tipo de Tarjeta

Tarjeta Virtual, Tarjeta Física

Tarjeta Virtual

Red de Tarjeta

Visa

Mastercard

Apple Pay

✓

✓

Google Pay

✓

✓

PintoPay CardActual

P

PintoPay Virtual Card

Recompensas

Reembolso

PintoPay Card—

PintoPay Virtual Card—

Cripto de Reembolso

PintoPay Card—

PintoPay Virtual CardUSD

Recompensas de Staking

PintoPay Card✗

PintoPay Virtual Card✗

APR de Staking

PintoPay Card—

PintoPay Virtual Card—

Bono de Bienvenida

PintoPay Card—

PintoPay Virtual Card$10

Bono de Referido

PintoPay Card$10

PintoPay Virtual Card$10.5

Tarifas

Tarifa Mensual

PintoPay CardGratis

PintoPay Virtual CardGratis

Emisión de Tarjeta

PintoPay Card$10

PintoPay Virtual Card$35

Tarifa ATM

PintoPay CardGratis

PintoPay Virtual CardGratis

Tarifa FX

PintoPay CardGratis

PintoPay Virtual Card1%

Tarifa de Recarga

PintoPay Card2.5%

PintoPay Virtual Card2.5%

Tarifa por Rechazo

PintoPay CardGratis

PintoPay Virtual CardGratis

Límites

Gasto Diario

PintoPay Card$25,000

PintoPay Virtual Card$1,500

Gasto Mensual

PintoPay CardSin límite

PintoPay Virtual CardSin límite

Retiro ATM

PintoPay CardSin límite

PintoPay Virtual CardSin límite

Info de Tarjeta

Tipo de Tarjeta

PintoPay CardTarjeta Virtual, Tarjeta Física

PintoPay Virtual CardTarjeta Virtual

Red de Tarjeta

PintoPay CardVisa

PintoPay Virtual CardMastercard

Apple Pay

PintoPay Card✓

PintoPay Virtual Card✓

Google Pay

PintoPay Card✓

PintoPay Virtual Card✓

Requisitos KYC

Puntuación de la Comunidad

4.8/10

Fuentes

Ver 49 Fuentes

@r/CryptoCurrency - PintoPay no KYC Card: Legit or Not?“The single most substantive organic thread on the card. Posters confirm it works at real point-of-sale terminals through Apple Pay and Google Pay and that skipping identity checks is the main draw, but the tone is pragmatic rather than trusting: the 2.5% load fee is called steep even though it undercuts the roughly 5% charged by Solcard, Telegram-bot account management is described as unintuitive and risky, and experienced users label the operation a grey-area service to be tested with minimal capital first. Heavy YouTube affiliate promotion is repeatedly cited as a red flag.”@r/defi - Anyone knows any good non-custodial crypto cards?“Thread where users hunt for cards that leave keys in their own hands. PintoPay surfaces only as a counter-example: it is custodial, requiring a transfer to the platform's own liquidity providers before anything can be spent, which the DeFi crowd contrasts unfavourably with smart-contract cards such as Bleap, EtherFi and Gnosis Pay. Useful evidence that the informed segment of the market treats the product as a prepaid wrapper, not a DeFi tool.”@r/defi - The best card/non-card options to spend crypto or stables?“Comparison thread benchmarking PintoPay against Zypto, Cypher, Kardpay and other issuers. Participants concede the no-KYC access has real value and that the load fee sits below the worst competitors, but rank it low on cost efficiency and custody, and warn that grey-market issuers can freeze balances or disappear with no recourse available.”@r/CryptoScams - Telegram scam?“Not PintoPay-specific. Cited in the Gemini pass to document the attack pattern users walk into when support runs through Telegram: scrapers identify anyone posting about a stuck transaction, then impersonators posing as official support arrive within minutes to request wallet credentials, API access, or an advance fee to release the funds. Relevant as threat-model context for a platform whose only support channel is Telegram.”@Alex Zubarev, Paulo Barroso, Sem Williams and other affiliate creators“The aggregated hashtag feed is the platform's main acquisition funnel and is close to uniformly promotional, since nearly every video carries a referral link. Recurring claims: two-minute setup, instant crypto-to-cash in 180-plus countries, seamless wallet integration. Both passes discount it as evidence. Engagement is thin with many uploads stalling under a thousand views, critical comments are moderated or drowned out, site testimonials mirror the creator scripts, and at least one French-language video markets the card explicitly as a way to sidestep the tax authorities.”@YouTube - How to Get PintoPay Card? Complete Review & Live Usage Guide“Affiliate-style walkthrough of Telegram issuance followed by live spending at checkout. Presents the flow as frictionless and the wallet integration as working, with no discussion of freeze risk, custody, or the multi-entity corporate chain behind issuance. Comment volume is low and mostly neutral or supportive.”@YouTube - Why I Use PinToPay Virtual Card Daily!“Daily-driver testimonial emphasising instant top-ups, Apple Pay compatibility and the absence of banking paperwork. Structurally promotional and treated by both passes as marketing rather than independent verification, though it is consistent with the genuine finding that low-value everyday spending does work as advertised.”@YouTube - Russian-language experience review“The most critical video in the set and the only one doing sustained hands-on testing. The creator walks through personal use while flagging what they read as pyramid-scheme characteristics in the referral structure, alongside practical limitations on limits and crediting. Longer and considerably more sceptical than the English-language affiliate coverage.”@YouTube - PintoPay The Fastest Growing Crypto Debit Card“Growth-narrative promo leaning on the platform's own adoption figures of 100,000-plus users, 180-plus countries and three-minute issuance. Repeats exactly the claims that the companion app's Google Play footprint contradicts, so it is retained as marketing signal rather than evidence of scale.”@YouTube - crypto cards overview“Multi-card roundup in which PintoPay appears as one option among several no-KYC issuers. Coverage is brief and descriptive, listing fees and onboarding steps rather than assessing reliability or fund safety.”@@pintopay_me (official account)“The brand's own feed dominates X volume with promotional posts. Its analytical value sits in the reply layer rather than the posts themselves: complainants tag the account about lost access and unrecoverable balances and are, on both passes' reading, largely left unanswered. Included as first-party marketing with organic replies attached, not as independent sentiment.”@@Coachkcrypto“July 2026 post reporting that the card simply works for no-KYC issuance and everyday transactions. One of the few clearly positive organic first-hand accounts on X, and consistent with the wider pattern that modest usage is unproblematic.”@@0xSkaar_“Thread describing loss of access to funds after a larger top-up, the canonical version of the pattern both passes identify, where small amounts move freely and a meaningful balance does not. Reports no resolution from the official account.”@@whalecobus“Posts about being unable to reach or withdraw a balance held on the platform, echoing the freeze reports concentrated on Trustpilot and Otzovik.”@@Ex0w_“Blunt warning against depositing at all, framing the service as a scam. Sits at the harshest end of organic X sentiment; posts in this cluster sometimes group PintoPay with other platforms alleged to be fraudulent.”@Trustpilot - pintopay.me (US)“Primary Trustpilot profile for the brand. Reviews cluster hard on one failure mode: balances that become inaccessible, cards disabled without notice, and support that answers with automation or not at all. Positive entries are sparse and closely echo the site's own marketing language, which both passes flag as possible astroturfing.”@Trustpilot - pintopay.me (AU)“Regional mirror of the same profile, cited in the Grok pass. Snippets are dominated by freeze and scam reports, and where a rating is visible it sits in the low-2 range out of 5.”@Trustpilot - pintopay.me (CA)“Canadian mirror of the brand profile with the same complaint distribution: inability to withdraw, support promises that are never fulfilled, and cards that stop working after a period of normal use.”@Trustpilot - individual review (UK)“Single-reviewer entry cited in the Grok pass as a first-hand freeze account: the top-up credits, then access is lost, then a support thread produces reassurance without resolution over an extended period.”@Trustpilot - individual review (DE)“German-language individual review in the same vein, reporting a blocked card and an unrecoverable balance with no escalation path to a human operator.”@Trustpilot - photonpay.com (citation artefact)“Included for completeness because the Gemini pass cited it, but this profile belongs to PhotonPay, a different company. It evidences nothing about PintoPay, and the 2.0 to 2.4 TrustScore that Gemini attributes to PintoPay appears to derive from this page and the two other mismatched profiles listed below. That specific number should be treated as unverified.”@Trustpilot - photonpay.com (citation artefact)“Second mirror of the PhotonPay profile from the Gemini works-cited list. Retained for traceability of the research trail; carries no PintoPay sentiment signal.”@Trustpilot - NOVA2PAY LIMITED (citation artefact)“Trustpilot profile for NOVA2PAY, another unrelated issuer cited in the Gemini pass. Kept only so the research trail stays auditable.”@Google Play - AWallet finance (XPROCESSING YAZILIM / Awallet LTD)“The companion Android app, and the sharpest evidence gap in the file. Users searching for PintoPay are routed to a differently branded app, and the listing shows a download footprint in the 100-plus tier against advertised adoption of 102,000 users and 35,000 active cards. The listing also carries the corporate map: UANT INC. trading as PintoPay in Delaware, issuance via Sunrate Solutions in Hong Kong, acquiring via Profit Group 1917 in the UK, liquidity via Coincierge Holdings in Lithuania and PeerSwap in Czechia. Its data-safety disclosure admits personal information, photos and video may be collected and shared with third parties, which cuts against the privacy pitch. No meaningful star rating or review body exists.”@Google Play - AWallet finance (English locale listing)“English-locale variant of the same listing, cited separately in the Gemini pass. Confirms the download tier and the data-sharing disclosures; contains no distinct review content of its own.”@Otzovik - kriptokarta PintoPay (approx. 23 reviews)“The densest body of first-hand reporting anywhere in the file, averaging around 3.1 out of 5 with roughly 43% of reviewers recommending it. Positives are specific and credible: virtual card issued in minutes, Apple Pay contactless working reliably, useful for subscriptions and travel across Turkey, Europe and Asia, and no monthly fee. Negatives are equally specific: frozen or disabled cards after larger top-ups, balances that cannot be withdrawn or migrated to a replacement card, delayed crediting of top-ups, unexpected per-transaction charges, cards never issued after the fee was paid, and support answering with templates.”@getcryptocards.io - PintoPay Card“Specialist card directory. Confirms the fee structure both passes rely on, namely roughly $35 issuance, a $10 first-purchase bonus, 2.5% on top-ups, about $0.25 per authorisation and no monthly or annual fee, plus the custodial deposit-to-balance-to-card flow. Feature-focused rather than reliability-focused.”@cardsfornomads.com - PintoPay“Nomad-oriented listing pitching the card at users who need a crypto-funded option where local cards fail. Documents limits and Apple Pay support but does not engage with the freeze reports, so it reads as a feature summary rather than an assessment.”@cryptocardhub.com - PintoPay Card“Aggregator scoring the card around 6.8 out of 10 on features. Both passes note the gap this exposes: directory scores weight advertised capability, while user platforms weight whether money comes back out again, and the two diverge sharply for this issuer.”@opencryptocards.com - PintoPay Card“Another directory entry cited in the Grok pass, and one of the sources responsible for the conflicting product details running through the file, including disagreement over Visa versus Mastercard, physical-card timelines, and whether ongoing cashback exists at all.”@BFM Times - PintoPay: the cryptocurrency and everyday payments“Overview article in promotional register, restating the platform's own positioning on borderless spending and fast issuance. No independent verification and no engagement with support or freeze complaints.”@crypto.ru - PintoPay“Russian-language overview covering mechanics and fees for a CIS audience. More balanced than the promo pieces, acknowledging both the practical appeal for users cut off from international cards and the operational risk of relying on an unregulated issuer.”@investlb.com - Paying for foreign subscriptions with a PintoPay card in 180 countries“Use-case article aimed at readers who cannot pay foreign subscription services with local cards. Reflects the card's strongest genuine function, small recurring international payments, while omitting downside risk entirely.”@vc.ru - PintoPay review: USDT for purchases“Russian-language review walking through funding with USDT and then spending it. Broadly favourable on convenience, with caveats about fees stacking up on small frequent transactions.”@coinspot.io - pintopay.me reviews (Russian wallet roundup)“Review-aggregation page collecting Russian-language user feedback inside a wider wallet comparison. Mixed picture, with convenience reports set directly against complaints about access to funds.”@b-mag.ru - PintoPay reviews“Russian review-aggregation page reaching a middling overall verdict. Complaint content centres on withdrawal and support failures rather than on the product's feature set.”@cryptorussia.ru - PintoPay razvod (fraud allegation)“Openly accusatory Russian-language page arguing the operation is a scam. Both passes treat pages like this cautiously since the allegations are largely unevidenced, but note that they cluster around the same freeze reports carried by better-documented sources.”@moshennik.eu - PintoPay company entry“Fraud-reporting directory listing carrying user-submitted complaints. Low evidentiary weight on its own, and grouped in the Grok pass with the wider Russian-language cluster in which the Central Bank of Russia listing, flagging the project for signs of illegal financial activity and financial-pyramid characteristics from around October 2024 onward, also appears.”@LinkedIn - PintoPay company page (HK) and commenters“The company page itself is unremarkable; the comments are not. People claiming insider or partner knowledge allege liquidity shortfalls, blocks imposed by card providers including Asinx, data-handling problems and delayed refunds. Unverified, but the specificity lines up with the freeze pattern users report independently elsewhere.”@Telegram - PinToPay Official Channel (@pintopayoff)“The official channel doubles as product surface and support desk, which is the structural problem both passes highlight. Announcements are promotional; the risk is that users publicly posting about a stuck transaction here become targets for impersonators within minutes. Included as the operational context in which most complaints originate.”@NameScan - 5AMLD compliance guidelines for crypto businesses“Regulatory background on EU anti-money-laundering obligations for virtual asset service providers. Establishes why an issuer routing through Hong Kong, Lithuania and Czechia can offer minimal-documentation cards at all, and why that arrangement is structurally fragile.”@Jurisprudential - Crypto card review: KYC models, limits, fees and compliance“Comparative analysis of KYC tiers across the card market. Supplies the benchmark both passes score against: regulated exchange cards charge roughly 0.9% to 3% and offer genuine support, against which 2.5% on every load plus per-authorisation charges reads as a compliance-avoidance premium.”@Jurisprudential - Crypto cards without KYC: limits, identification, risks and regulation“Sector analysis of the no-KYC segment that explains the core contradiction in the product. Visa, Mastercard and Apple Pay all impose transaction monitoring on issuers, so unverified funding sources eventually trip risk parameters and the account is frozen, at which point an anonymous holder has no way to prove ownership and no recourse.”@RootData - In-depth comparison of the top ten crypto payment cards“Market survey covering everything from application flow to fees across leading issuers. Used as competitive context; PintoPay's economics sit well below the median it establishes.”@Coin Bureau - Best crypto debit cards 2026“Comparison of thirteen cards, cited as the benchmark showing regulated and self-custodial alternatives offering zero FX fees, free issuance and substantial ongoing cashback. This is what makes PintoPay's fee load hard to defend on economics alone.”@Paymentscan - Crypto card comparison 2026: fees and cashback“Fee and cashback comparison table used to position PintoPay against the wider market. Reinforces the finding that the platform competes on access rather than on cost or rewards.”@Bleap - Best crypto card 2026: full list comparison“Competitor-published comparison, so not neutral, but useful for the specific contrast both passes draw between non-custodial smart-contract cards where the user keeps their keys and PintoPay's model, where funds must be surrendered to third-party liquidity providers before they can be spent.”@Telegram Wallet - How to avoid scams when using P2P“Platform guidance on Telegram-based financial scams, documenting the impersonation and advance-fee patterns that users of a Telegram-first card are exposed to the moment they surface a problem publicly.”@Iconomi - Telegram crypto scams: how to spot and avoid them“Overview of Telegram scam mechanics, included as support for the file's strongest structural criticism: routing account management and support through Telegram amplifies user exposure at precisely the moment they are already in trouble.”

PintoPay Card scores 4.8/10 across 49 community sources, unifying two independent deep-research passes. Onboarding is the one dimension both passes rate highly: a Telegram mini-app issues a virtual card in two to three minutes with no documents, and it provisions into Apple Pay and Google Pay well enough that small everyday spending, foreign subscriptions and travel purchases work as advertised, which matters most for Russian and CIS users whose local cards are refused abroad. Everything downstream is where sentiment collapses. The dominant complaint pattern across Trustpilot, Otzovik and X is strikingly consistent: small test top-ups clear, then a meaningful balance triggers a freeze, a disabled card, or a withdrawal that never processes, with support cycling through bot replies and promises that stretch from weeks to months. Support is the worst-rated dimension at 2/10, and several users report paying the issuance fee and never receiving a card at all. Economics are poor by 2026 standards, roughly $35 issuance offset by a $10 first-purchase bonus, 2.5% on every crypto load, about $0.25 per authorisation and no ongoing cashback beyond referral commissions, which both passes read as a premium paid for regulatory avoidance rather than a competitive product. Privacy is real but conditional: light verification genuinely shields identity, yet the model is fully custodial, funds sit with third-party liquidity and issuing entities spread across Delaware, Hong Kong, the UK, Lithuania and Czechia, and Telegram as the sole support channel exposes users to impersonation and phishing at exactly the moment they are already in trouble. Three caveats matter for readers. The Central Bank of Russia has listed the project as showing signs of illegal financial activity and financial-pyramid characteristics. Product details conflict across sources on card network, physical-card availability and whether cashback exists at all. And claimed adoption outruns the evidence, with 102,000-plus users advertised against a companion Android app sitting in the 100-plus download tier.

Desglose por Categoría

Características

No Disponible

Criptomonedas Soportadas

USDT