Ledger CL Card

卡片概览

KYC 要求

社区评分

4.7/10

来源于

查看 60 个来源

@kate_richter“Hit an undisclosed EUR 10,000 maximum spending limit during a medical emergency, leaving EUR 6,000 frozen. Account upgrade request submitted to release the funds went unanswered by support for days.”@arturpk“Overall spending limit was suddenly cut to $1,000 with no prior notification, rendering deposited funds inaccessible and triggering demands for immediate Proof of Funds documentation.”@ItsSprite99“Transfers from Ledger wallet to CL Card took two to five hours to credit. User identified that the Baanx backend bundles transactions and sets network fees too low for prevailing block space demand, making the card unusable for time-sensitive point-of-sale top-ups.”@dakky21“After a declined transaction at Amazon, attempted to convert ETH to LTC to withdraw at lower network fees. The system blocked the withdrawal and demanded an arbitrary account level upgrade before releasing the user own capital.”@r/ledgerwallet community“US availability thread. Confirms the card works in the US excluding Vermont but that US residents are barred from the Cryptodraft credit line, stripping the product of its most valuable feature. Heavy discussion of the custodial trap: transferring from the hardware signer hands custody to Baanx.”@r/ledgerwallet community“Early hands-on review thread. Praises rapid physical card delivery within roughly a two-week window and the polished visual integration inside the Ledger interface. Notes the card as a way to bypass centralized exchanges for emergency fiat conversion.”@r/ledgerwallet community“Aggregated complaints on accounts placed under review without warning, opaque compliance triggers, and Ledger redirecting all responsibility to the Baanx support address.”@r/ledgerwallet community“Report of a blocked card and locked balance following an automated AML flag, with no clear remediation path and no response from Baanx support.”@r/ledgerwallet community“Formal complaint thread documenting the escalation process against Baanx after prolonged fund inaccessibility, and the absence of an effective ombudsman route.”@r/ledgerwallet community“Community thread during the 2026 Baanx distress period, with users trading insolvency rumors and comparing stuck-withdrawal timelines.”@Trustpilot reviewers“CL Cards holds roughly 3.6 out of 5 across approximately 250-260 reviews, with about 33% leaving 1 star. Highly polarized: functional users report cashback working as expected, while recent reviews are dominated by frozen funds and pending withdrawals.”@UK Trustpilot reviewers“UK reviewer base reports slow replies with typical response times exceeding a month on negative reviews, generic templated answers, and pressure to upgrade accounts before funds are released.”@TAYSPORTS“Details an excruciating experience with a pending crypto withdrawal stuck for over a week, met only with automated and unhelpful customer service responses.”@TW twenty“Reports the same pattern of withdrawals stuck in pending status for extended periods with no substantive support engagement.”@Baanx Trustpilot reviewers“Parent company Baanx rates approximately 2.5 out of 5, worse than the CL Cards entity. Highly critical reviews cite whistleblower allegations of a GBP 14m shortfall in customer funds and a skeleton crew manually clearing a withdrawal backlog. The company denies the claims and attributes delays to compliance checks and volume.”@Trustpilot reviewers (NZ)“Regional Trustpilot listing mirroring the global pattern of frozen funds, pending withdrawals and support failures.”@Trustpilot reviewers (ES)“Spanish-language reviewer base reporting KYC friction, sudden account restrictions on verified users, and slow resolution of pending balances.”@Trustpilot reviewers (FR)“French-language reviews echoing withdrawal delays and support latency; some positive notes on everyday Mastercard acceptance when the account is unrestricted.”@Trustpilot reviewers (IT)“Italian-language reviews focused on compliance holds and the effective cost of crypto-funded spending versus the advertised cashback.”@Trustpilot reviewers (NL)“Dutch-language reviews documenting under review status on accounts and difficulty retrieving deposited capital.”@Trustpilot reviewers (AU)“Australian Trustpilot listing consistent with the global negative skew on support responsiveness and fund access.”@Trustpilot reviewers (IE)“Irish Trustpilot listing; reviewers report the company replies to many negatives but slowly and without resolving the underlying freeze.”@Ledger (video) / commenters“Card announcement video. Comment section is the UGC layer: viewers question the self-custody framing given the custodial CL account, and repeatedly raise geographic exclusion outside the EEA, UK and North America.”@Ledger ecosystem reviewer / commenters“Ecosystem walkthrough praising the convenience of managing cold storage, dApps and fiat spending inside a single Ledger Live interface, plus the 1% cashback in BTC, USDT or USDC. Commenters counter that conversion spreads and funding fees exceed the reward value.”@Mad Investor“2022 unboxing and full review. Positive on physical card quality, Ledger Live top-up flow and Mastercard acceptance; light on the fee stack and custody implications.”@efbewe / Der Privatsparer“German-language long-term experience update (2025). Notes concrete improvements including live chat support and restored crypto withdrawals, while maintaining criticism of the effective fee load on crypto-funded spending.”@X users (organic)“Aggregate organic X discourse through July 2026: multi-week and over-one-month pending crypto withdrawals, delayed BXX token transfers, accounts locked under review, and philosophical backlash that a custodial card balance contradicts Ledger self-custody ethos. Ledger official accounts consistently redirect support to Baanx.”@@MahadevWrites“Public criticism of CL Card support handling and the gap between Ledger self-custody marketing and the custodial reality of the card balance.”@@thereal_estigan“Complaints regarding pending withdrawals and unresponsive Baanx support during the 2026 partner distress period.”@Android reviewers (incl. Jim)“Ledger Wallet crypto app rated approximately 4.5/5 across 35,600+ reviews and 1,000,000+ downloads (Ledger SAS). Positives: seamless Bluetooth pairing with Ledger Flex and Nano X, ad-free multi-network portfolio tracking, in-app staking and CL Card management. Negatives: chronic Bluetooth sync timeouts, balances erroneously displaying zero until resync, and clunky third-party integrations including Baanx and Changelly. One critical review says the mobile app cannot display correct wallet balances and recommends Tangem instead; user Jim reports a flawless Ledger Flex setup and zero issues interacting with Kraken.”@iOS reviewers“Apple App Store listing for the parent app used to order, fund and manage the CL Card. Feedback tracks the Android listing on hardware pairing and portfolio tracking, with recurring reports of sync and balance-display issues.”@Ruben Middelhoven“Independent 2025 audit that dismantles the reward math: a ~1.75% crypto-to-fiat conversion spread layered on a 2% card spending fee produces an effective ~3.75% transaction cost, so the 1% BTC cashback leaves a net 2.75% loss versus spending ordinary fiat.”@Spark.money“Comparative crypto debit card audit corroborating the layered conversion spread plus spending fee structure and ranking the CL Card poorly on effective cost against peers.”@ChainUp“2026 review of seven cards marketed as no-fee, concluding that headline zero-fee claims mask conversion spreads and ATM charges; CL Card assessed within that frame.”@Milk Road“Rewards-focused roundup highlighting the Cryptodraft credit line at 0% interest for the first 10% of loan-to-value as a tax-efficient way to access fiat liquidity without a taxable disposal event.”@DefiMap“Full review covering fees, cashback tiers and regional availability; positive on Ledger integration, cautious on the custodial card balance and support record.”@DefiMap“Structured card profile listing fee schedule, supported assets, cashback options and supported regions.”@CoinCodeCap“June 2026 review arguing the card competes on security architecture rather than rewards economics, citing hardware-level transaction authorization via the certified Secure Element. Honest limitations noted: 1% cashback trails alternatives, the free ATM allowance is conservative, and availability is restricted.”@Spendnode“Card profile detailing the ~2% crypto spend/conversion fee, ~1.75% FX fee, and ATM charges of roughly EUR 2.50-3.00 plus 1.5%, concluding economics are net negative for crypto-funded or international use.”@Spendnode“Issuer-level overview of Ledger card products and their operating partners.”@VaultCompare“Comparison listing benchmarking the CL Card against competing crypto debit cards on fees, limits and custody model.”@Cryptonoshi“EU-focused product listing documenting eligibility requirements and the EEA-restricted issuing footprint.”@Singh Crypto“2025 review positive on Ledger Live integration, free virtual card, and Apple Pay and Google Pay support for existing Ledger users.”@BestCryptoCards“Directory entry summarizing cashback tiers, the 2% BXX option, supported assets and regional availability.”@Der Privatsparer“German written review paired with the long-term video updates; documents support and verification issues alongside the fee load on crypto top-ups.”@Cardpilled“Issuer profile for Baanx covering the white-label card programs it operates, including CL Card and MetaMask Card.”@WalletScrutiny“Security-oriented assessment of the CL Card, examining the custody boundary between the Ledger signer and the Baanx-held card balance.”@Kreditkarten.com“German card comparison entry listing fees, limits and cashback structure for the CL Card.”@CoinCodex“Explainer covering how the prepaid Mastercard works, Ledger Live top-up flow, supported assets (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, EURT) and the Baanx issuing relationship for UK and EEA customers.”@The Block“Coverage of Baanx and Mastercard powering the MetaMask card, establishing Baanx as an infrastructure provider across multiple major crypto card programs.”@Altcoin Buzz“Launch coverage framing the card as a bridge between hardware-secured holdings and everyday spending at 90 million+ merchants.”@Altcoin Buzz via Binance Square“Syndicated launch coverage on Binance Square with community engagement; positive framing of global crypto spending, with commenters raising regional availability limits.”@Gblock“Reports a counterfeit app named Leva Heal Limited that mimicked the Ledger Live interface, passed Apple review, and drained $9.5 million by prompting users for their 24-word recovery phrase. Relevant as an ecosystem risk for mobile CL Card management, not a flaw in the legitimate app.”@Dealroom“Exodus appointed UK receivers over Monavate and Baanx.com Ltd in April 2026 after W3C Corp defaulted on a $70 million secured term loan. Directly relevant to counterparty risk on custodial CL Card balances.”@TradingView News“Receivership coverage noting Exodus stated operations for Monavate and Baanx customers and teams would remain unchanged during the process, against a backdrop of spiking user reports of stuck funds.”@Exodus Movement, Inc. (SEC 8-K)“SEC 8-K filing detailing enforcement of the $70M secured loan, appointment of AlixPartners receivers over Monavate Holdings, Monavate Ltd and Baanx.com Ltd, and the planned share sale process.”@AInvest“Exodus acquired the outstanding shares of Monavate Holdings and Baanx.com Ltd from the receivers in May 2026 for $76.27 million, netted against the W3C loan. Resolves ownership uncertainty but confirms the severity of the distress period users experienced.”@Coinmonks (Medium)“Investor-oriented review of the BXX utility token. Context for analyst warnings against taking the 2% cashback in BXX, which adds exposure to an illiquid, volatile micro-cap rather than accumulating BTC or stablecoins.”@UK Financial Conduct Authority“FCA Register entry for Baanx.com Ltd, registered as a cryptoasset business under money-laundering regulations. Registration is for AML supervision only; customer balances are not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.”@Legal.ge“Georgian legal consultancy guidance confirming the CL Card is not issued to Georgian residents. Onboarding requires Veriff KYC with verifiable proof of residency in a supported jurisdiction, and circumventing geo-restrictions via VPN or mail forwarding routinely triggers Baanx risk algorithms and indefinite fund locks.”

Ledger CL Card 在 60 个社区信息来源中获得 4.7/10 的评分——这是一个可信硬件品牌被其法币合作方拖累的典型案例。用户称赞 Ledger Live 集成、实体卡寄送迅速，以及 Cryptodraft 信用额度能在不触发应税处置事件的前提下释放流动性。但 Reddit、Trustpilot 与 X 上的口碑，主要被账户冻结、额度被随意下调与提现挂起数周所主导，客服外包给 Baanx 后被普遍反映无人回应。独立的费用测算显示，用加密货币充值消费的真实成本接近 3.75%（约 1.75% 的兑换点差加 2% 的消费费），这远远抵消了宣传中 1% 的 BTC/USDC 返现。资金一旦从 Ledger 签名设备转入 CL 账户，就彻底脱离了自托管，且不受 FSCS 保护——这一缺口在 2026 年 4 至 5 月 Baanx/Monavate 进入破产管理期间进一步扩大。格鲁吉亚居民不可使用。

分项评分

功能

支持的加密货币

BTCETHSOLUSDTUSDCXRPBCHLTC