Crypto Cards
首页
关于我们联系我们企业中心
首页
免 KYC 卡商务卡比特币卡XRP 卡
🇮🇳印度🇨🇦加拿大🇦🇺澳大利亚🇬🇧英国🇪🇺欧洲🇳🇱荷兰🇦🇪阿联酋🇸🇬新加坡🇳🇬尼日利亚
关于我们联系我们企业中心
Crypto Cards

按费用、KYC 要求、隐私评分与功能对比加密货币信用卡。

卡片

  • 首页
  • 免 KYC 卡
  • 商务卡
  • 比特币卡
  • XRP 卡

国家/地区

  • 印度
  • 加拿大
  • 澳大利亚
  • 英国
  • 欧洲
  • 荷兰
  • 阿联酋
  • 新加坡
  • 尼日利亚

公司

  • 关于我们
  • 评分方法
  • 联系我们

法律条款

  • 条款与条件
  • 隐私政策

2026 Crypto Cards. 保留所有权利。

本站数据仅供参考,请务必自行核实研究。

  1. 首页
  2. /
  3. 卡片
  4. /
  5. UPay Stellar Card
UPay Stellar Card
UPay Stellar Card
证件验证
虚拟卡 Visa
4.6
综合
获取此卡
UPay Stellar Card logo

UPay Stellar Card

发行方 UPay Technology Ltd.

虚拟卡•Visa•证件验证
获取此卡

一款专为小额数字支付优化的纯虚拟卡,拥有较高的每日限额,但充值费用较高。

优点

  • +每日交易限额高达 $20,000
  • +无月度维护费
  • +支持 Apple Pay 和 Google Pay
  • +闲置资金可赚取高达 4% APR 的收益

缺点

  • -高达 $50 的开卡费
  • -3% 的充值费用相对较高
  • -不支持 ATM 取现
  • -需要 Level 3 KYC 认证
4.6/10
综合一般
3.7/10
社区评分基于 46 个信息来源
Lv 3
KYC 等级证件验证

目录

卡片概览

UPay Stellar Card
奖励
返现
0%
返现币种
—
质押奖励
✓
质押年化收益
4%
新用户奖励
—
推荐奖励
$30
费用
月费
免费
开卡费
$50
ATM 取现费
免费
外汇兑换费
1%
充值费
3%
交易拒付费
免费
限额
每日消费
$20,000
每月消费
不限额
ATM 取现
$0
卡片信息
卡片类型
虚拟卡
卡组织
Visa
Apple Pay
✓
Google Pay
✓
奖励
返现
0%
返现币种
—
质押奖励
✓
质押年化收益
4%
新用户奖励
—
推荐奖励
$30
费用
月费
免费
开卡费
$50
ATM 取现费
免费
外汇兑换费
1%
充值费
3%
交易拒付费
免费
限额
每日消费
$20,000
每月消费
不限额
ATM 取现
$0
卡片信息
卡片类型
虚拟卡
卡组织
Visa
Apple Pay
✓
Google Pay
✓

KYC 要求

Level: 证件验证
邮箱验证
需要
手机验证
需要
身份证件
需要
地址证明
不需要
自拍验证
不需要

社区评分

3.7/10
来源于
@Trustpilot - Upay Technology Limited (upay.best)“The densest vein of first-hand testimony, rated Poor at roughly 2.5 stars and carrying a high-risk-investment warning banner. Recurring themes: accounts frozen after deposits, false politically-exposed-person flags with no appeal route, quasi-cash declines, Apple Pay sold but regionally unavailable, and issuance fees not refunded when the card proves unusable.”@Trustpilot CA - Upay Technology Limited“Second research pass over the same profile recorded about 2.6/5 from roughly 19 reviews, so the headline figure moves with sample size. Company replies are formulaic, attributing problems to compliance, third-party verification or card network rules and directing users to open a ticket.”@Google Play - UPay Wallet (com.upay2.wallet)“The primary app-store data point: 2.8 stars across roughly 142 reviews on 100K+ installs, last updated January 2026. The dominant complaint is the OTP gateway failing within seconds with a network-abnormal error, which locks users out of their own funds during market moves.”@Google Play - UPay Wallet (UK locale)“Recent reviews here centre on the identity verification system refusing to complete even when clean documents are submitted, with no way to retry or retrieve what was uploaded, plus Passkey support breaking sign-in on standard Android devices.”@Google Play - UPay Wallet (Filipino locale)“Carries the post-update crash reports: after v11.9 the app flashes and closes immediately on launch, barring access to funds entirely.”@Google Play - UPay Wallet (Malay locale)“Echoes the same verification and sign-in failures reported in other locales, and confirms the in-app LiveChat support bot lacks a text input field so complex issues cannot be escalated.”@Google Play - UPay Wallet (Arabic locale)“Used to confirm the complaint pattern is global rather than a single-region SMS routing fault, since the same OTP and crash reports appear across every locale checked.”@Apple App Store - UPay Wallet“iOS listing for the wallet. Review volume is thin next to the Android listing, but the comments mirror the same verification and sign-in failures.”@r/CryptoCurrency“Long-running warning thread about Paycent, which took BTC and ETH deposits against a promised UPayInternational debit card that users say never arrived. A separate and older company, but it is the first thing basic due diligence surfaces.”@r/CryptoCurrency“Crowd-sourced scam list naming UPAY-branded MLM and Ponzi schemes such as IPC and IMAL2U that paid referral kickbacks. Distinct entities from the Dubai issuer, but the name collision is corrosive.”@r/HongKong“Thread seeking help identifying a Hong Kong-based site after a suspected scam, surfaced by UPay-adjacent searches. Illustrates how thin and negative the organic Reddit footprint is - no contemporary positive discussion was found in any major crypto subreddit.”@ParidaFX (YouTube)“India-focused creator review rating it a strong local option, citing prop-firm payouts and everyday spending without bank freezes or P2P friction. The comment section is markedly more mixed, with KYC rejections and slow processing reported.”@Android Lecture BD (YouTube)“Bengali-language promo pitching a dual-currency USD card obtainable without a passport. Representative of the affiliate framing that pulls users from capital-controlled markets straight into the account-freeze trap.”@YouTube Shorts - UPay dual currency card“Short-form referral promo repeating the dual-currency, no-passport pitch. High reach, zero independent verification.”@YouTube - #upaycard“Hashtag feed aggregating the card's video coverage. Uploads skew promotional and referral-linked while comment sections carry the failed OTP, frozen account and blocked transaction reports. Critical channels including Market Minder and Crypto Khel publish direct warning videos on hidden cancellation fees and sudden account blocks.”@YouTube - #cryptocard“Broader category feed used to position UPay against competing crypto cards and to locate the independent critical review channels rather than the affiliate uploads.”@YouTube - #redotpay“Competitor hashtag feed. Creators frequently rank UPay against RedotPay, with conclusions splitting on reliability rather than features.”@@UPayOfficial_EN (X)“The official account dominates the X footprint with campaigns, Apple Pay announcements and referral pushes. Independent organic discussion, positive or negative, is close to absent - itself a finding about how thin the verifiable user base is.”@The Cryptonomist on Binance Square“Affiliate-style overview and the main source for the tier table: 50 USDT issuance on Stellar, a 20,000 USD daily limit, a 1% baseline transaction fee and cross-border fees scaling to 3%. Used for fee facts rather than sentiment.”@The Cryptonomist on Binance Square“Round-up of Apple Pay-compatible crypto cards listing UPay favourably. Contrasts directly with users who paid the issuance fee for Apple Pay and then found it unavailable in their region.”@The Coin Republic“One of the few news pieces to report the friction rather than only the feature set, covering expanded spending options while acknowledging the mixed reception.”@Finbold“Guide to the crypto-to-fiat spending flow covering funding, conversion and card mechanics. Useful for confirming the custodial funding model behind the card balance.”@Kardd“Comparison-site review of tiers, fees and onboarding. Broadly favourable on accessibility with caveats on top-up costs and regional feature gaps.”@ProductHunter“Independent review weighing spending utility against the custodial model and the KYC demands that follow deposits.”@TechBullion“Tech-press profile, positive in framing and closer to a press release than an audit. No coverage of freezes or declines.”@Trends4Tech“Review focused on day-to-day usability and supported assets, positive overall with only light treatment of compliance risk.”@Income365 - crypto cards directory“Directory entry listing tiers, limits and fees, used to cross-check the published fee table against other independent sources.”@The Cryptonomist“Editorial review of the card, notable because the same outlet's affiliate posts on Binance Square carry the strongest promotional claims found anywhere in the corpus.”@ZyCrypto“Walkthrough of paying merchants in crypto with the card. Instructional and promotional rather than evaluative.”@Analytics Insight“Short feature framing the card as a seamless instant-payment product. Marketing-led, with no mention of the freeze or decline problems.”@CryptoWeSearch (Chinese-language)“Chinese-language walkthrough with detailed fee tables for USDT card usage. Valuable for cross-checking top-up percentages against the English-language claims, which are inconsistent.”@Scribd - Upay Wallet FAQ (user upload)“User-uploaded FAQ and onboarding guide covering wallet basics, passwords and card issuance. Useful for documented mechanics, unverified provenance.”@Caplight - UPay company profile“Private-market profile confirming UPay Technology LTD as a Dubai-headquartered fintech, used to separate the operating entity from the unrelated UPay brands crowding search results.”@StraitsX Blog“Issuing-partner explainer on stablecoin-backed card mechanics. Establishes that fiat settlement and card rails are third-party, which is why partner risk models rather than UPay policy drive the freezes and merchant-category blocks users hit.”@Paysafe Developer Docs“Payments API reference used to explain merchant category codes, specifically MCC 6051 quasi-cash and MCC 7995 gambling. This is the mechanism behind the seemingly arbitrary declines when users try to top up Revolut or similar wallets.”@Google Patents - WO2013082190A1“Transaction risk-scoring and seasoning patent cited as background on how graduated risk models behave inside card networks. Context only, carries no user sentiment.”@UPay Limited (UK) - Payment Services Agreement“Terms document cited in the research for its clause reserving the right to limit, suspend or refuse transactions without advance notice. Flagged as brand-collision material: this is a separate UK entity, not the Dubai crypto issuer.”@Google Play - upay (United Commercial Bank, Bangladesh)“Unrelated Bangladeshi mobile banking app sharing the name. Catalogued specifically to keep its ratings and reviews out of the crypto card's metrics.”@Google Play - UPay (Armenia)“Unrelated Armenian utility payment app under the same brand, excluded from the metrics but a real source of due-diligence confusion.”@Google Play - Upay One (United Kingdom)“Unrelated UK payment app, catalogued as part of the trademark collision that pollutes searches for the crypto card.”@Apple App Store - Midland Online“Unrelated banking app surfacing in UPay-adjacent searches. Recorded only to document the search noise and keep it out of the scoring.”@Midland Bank PLC - Annual Report“Bangladeshi bank filing that appears in UPay searches via the Bangladeshi namesake. Search noise, catalogued for exclusion.”@Gegidze - Georgia Crypto Tax Guide“Sets out Georgia's 0% personal capital gains treatment of crypto and the newer FATF-aligned VASP registration duty, which is what lets a foreign-issued card be used there without local licensing exposure.”@TBC Bank - international card payment changes“Documents the 1.5% cross-currency markup and the dynamic currency conversion prompts a foreign USD card meets on Georgian terminals. Stacked with UPay's own 1-3% cross-border fee, roughly 3-5% of purchasing power is lost per local transaction in Tbilisi.”@TBC Concept Card (TBC Bank, Georgia)“Local card terms used as the comparison baseline for Tbilisi spending, where a domestic GEL account carries no conversion cost at local terminals.”@TBC Bank - subscription plans“Local fee schedules used to price the alternative: off-ramping USDT through a Georgian exchange into a GEL account and spending fee-free.”

UPay Stellar Card scores 3.7/10 across 46 sources unifying two independent research passes that agreed on the substance and diverged mainly on how harshly to weight it. Both passes identified the same structural problem: an aggressive affiliate campaign aimed at South Asia and other capital-controlled markets sells the card as a passport-free, low-KYC route to USD spending, while the backend runs institutional-grade AML screening through Sumsub. Users onboard expecting anonymity, then report being frozen mid-transaction and asked for exactly the documentation they were trying to avoid, with false politically-exposed-person flags and no workable appeal path the most repeated complaint. Verified review platforms are the hard evidence and they agree with each other at roughly 2.5-2.8 stars on both Trustpilot and Google Play, against overwhelmingly positive but referral-linked YouTube coverage. Documented app failures include an OTP gateway timing out in about four to five seconds with a network error, hard crashes on launch after the v11.9 update, Passkey incompatibility on common Android devices, and an in-app support bot with no text input field that leaves users unable to escalate anything. Quasi-cash blocking (MCC 6051) makes the card unreliable for funding other wallets or exchanges, and Apple Pay is regionally gated despite being the reason many users paid the 50 USDT issuance fee. Costs stack: 50 USDT issuance, roughly 2-3% top-up and 1-3% cross-border. Brand collision with unrelated UPay entities in Bangladesh, Armenia and the UK, plus a legacy Paycent card scam, badly pollutes due diligence but is not evidence against the current Dubai operator. Where the two passes split, the higher scores rested on creator demos and the lower on verified store data; the unified scores lean toward the verified data.

分项评分

KYC 便捷度
4/10
费用性价比
5/10
奖励价值
3/10
App 体验
4/10
隐私
3/10
客服质量
3/10

功能

闪付(非接触支付)Staking

支持的加密货币

BTC iconBTCETH iconETHUSDT iconUSDTUSDC iconUSDCDOGE iconDOGE