Compare Zeroid Cards
Zeroid Instant Virtual CardZeroid Smart Entry Metal CardZeroid Elite Metal CardZeroid Premium Metal CardCurrentZeroid Instant Virtual CardZeroid Smart Entry Metal CardZeroid Elite Metal CardZeroid Premium Metal CardCurrentKYC Requirements
Community Score
Unified sentiment from two independent deep-research reports (Gemini and Grok). The Zeroid Premium Metal Card (zeroid.cards) markets an anonymous, no-KYC physical metal Visa with unlimited daily/monthly spending, zero FX fees and custom engraving, gated behind a high upfront cost: roughly $249 issuance plus a $300 minimum top-up, with Grok documenting tiered pricing around $199-$599 USDT and $100-$1,000 minimum top-ups. Independent signal is thin and predominantly negative. Trustpilot reviewers for zeroid.cards report transferring crypto and then receiving no dashboard, no visible balance and no support reply, alleging total unrecoverable loss; the separate app.zeroid.cc profile is more mixed, pairing a few reports of working cards and attentive support with accounts of uncredited top-ups (around 400 USDT), ignored refund promises, pressure to send more funds, anonymous Telegram-only support, and bans following withdrawal attempts. Reviewers openly dispute which of the two near-identical domains is the legitimate one. Trust scanners flag both as young, WHOIS-hidden and crypto-high-risk, with Gridinsoft scoring zeroid.cc near 11/100 and zeroid.cards near 56/100. No companion mobile app exists on either store for card management or 3DS approval, the sole ZeroID listing on Google Play being an unrelated Kyrgyz corporate document-verification tool, and no unboxing, POS or ATM footage of the physical metal card could be found. Organic discussion is nearly absent because the name collides with a popular Korean dermocosmetic skincare line, an open-source AI agent identity protocol, an encrypted messenger and Pokemon/vintage-toy content, burying warnings beneath unrelated results. A no-KYC physical card with unlimited limits is additionally implausible under FATF Travel Rule, MiCA and FinCEN requirements. For Tbilisi, Georgia, local POS infrastructure supports legitimate crypto-to-fiat cards, so failure would stem from the product itself rather than local restriction. Overall direction: strongly negative with severe advance-fee-fraud red flags; engagement carries high risk of total capital loss.
Category Breakdown
Features
Supported Cryptocurrencies
USDT
BTC
ETH
SOL
TRX